The Human Nature of Medea

Euripides contemporaries and classical scholars alike point out the non-Aristotelean elements in Medea, this might intimidate todays reader. Euripides, instead of following the guidelines established by Aristotle in his Poetics, has a stirring psychological truth of forgiving nature. This is clear when we examine the monologues given by Medea during the play. Each effectual transfer develops the character and creates a certain audience empathy. Medea is non a disaster of a good person with a flaw. It is the catastrophe of what eruptions occur in aneself and adepts society when morality is annihilated. However, his tragedy is non all a violation of a moral code, merely withal an act in violation of human moderateness and dignity. charm the culture and politics of Ancient Greece take hold changed all over the centuries, the basic human emotions such as anger, fear and passion that Euripides has written about have not. This makes his work more wide accepted an d understood today than that of his contemporaries. Aristotle states that one of the vital elements in a successful tragedy is Character: There end be an element of character in the play, if . . . what a influential person says or does reveals a certain moral purpose; and a good element of character, if the purpose so revealed is good.

Such accountability is possible in every type of personage, even in a woman or a slave, though the one is perhaps an inferior, and the other a wholly worthless institution(Aristotle 242). It is clear from the outset that Euripides has not created the protagonist of whom Ari stotle speaks. Medeas purpose is not good. ! This is evident in her first exchange with the Chorus: plainly I am deserted, a refugee, thought nothing of by my husband, something he won in a foreign land. I have no mother or brother, If you want to lease a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay